Forests as a public and free good :

Forests run the risk of getting privatized with the proposed Forest Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2021

Authors

  • Veena Mahor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v6iII.171

Abstract

The need of the hour for any country is to protect and preserve its forest for combating the climate crisis. Although India is nowhere close to achieving its target of ensuring that 33 percent of its geographical area is under forest cover as laid in its National Forest Policy, 1988, it does not appear to be making much effort towards it. The recent proposed amendments in the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 run the risk of making forests a contested market commodity among private players and big corporations like railways and highway authorities. It further runs the risk of deteriorating the status of forests, taking away the element of public good, and putting it in the category of private goods and thus making it excludable and rivalrous.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Veena Mahor

Veena Mahor is a development professional with experience and interest in the Decentralization and Local Governance sector. She has closely worked in the Fifth Scheduled Regions of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh in India with the tribal population and has a good understanding of the implementation of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Regions) Act, 1996, and Forest Rights Act, 2006. She has a master’s in social work from The Maharaja Sayajeerao University in Baroda, master’s in Population Sciences from the International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai and master’s in Public Policy & Governance from Chinmaya Vishwa Vidhyapeeth, Kerela, India.

Published

2022-10-01

How to Cite

Mahor, V. (2022). Forests as a public and free good : : Forests run the risk of getting privatized with the proposed Forest Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2021. Jindal Journal of Public Policy, 6(II), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v6iII.171

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Bhagwati, Jagdish, 2004. “In Defense of Globalization”, Oxford University Press, 135-161.

2. Bhattacharya, Kaushik, 2021. “Extended Reach Drilling to create disturbance in adjoining forest area”, The Hitavada, The People’s Paper. https://www.thehitavada.com/Encyc/2021/11/22/-Extended-Reach-Drilling-to-create disturbance-in-adjoining-forest-area-.html (accessed on 4th July 2022)

3. Bijoy R C, 2020. “Repeated amendments to land diversion laws threatening forests, people”, Business Standard, September 28. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current affairs/repeated-amendments-to-land-diversion-laws-threatening-forests-dwellers 120092800967_1.html (accessed on 27th November 2021)

Dutta Ritwick, 2021. “The Govt. Allows Miners to Pay and Mine. Can Khori Gaon’s residents Pay and Stay?”, Science, the WIRE, July 23. https://science.thewire.in/environment/khori gaon-eviction-environment-ministry-compensatory-afforestation-article-14-indian constitution/ (accessed on 25th November 2021)

Hindustan Times, 2021. “Key Changes proposed in Forest Conservation Act 1980, October 6. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/key-changes-proposed-in-forest conservation-act-1980-101633492055682.html (accessed on 25th November 2021)

Hornby, Albert Sydney. (1995). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of current English / [by] A.S. Hornby; editor Jonathan Crowther. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

John, Haritha, 2021. “How proposed changes to Forest Act could pave way for more environment damage”, The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/how proposed-changes-forest-act-could-pave-way-more-environmental-damage-158376v (accessed on 5th July 2022)

Journals of India, 2021. “Amendments to Forest Conservation Act (FCA), April 7. https://journalsoindia.com/amendment-to-forest-conservation-act-fca/ (accessed on 25th November 2021)

Karmakar, Rahul, 2020. “NGT seeks explanation on drilling for oil in Assam national park”, The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/ngt-seeks-explanation on-drilling-for-oil-in-assam-national-park/article32159368.ece (accessed on 5th July 2022)

Kukreti Ishan, Sahu Ranjan Priya, 2019. “Forest Rights Act: Are state govts the real land maias?”, DownToEarth, March 20. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/forests/forest rights-act-are-state-govts-the-real-land-maias--63664 (accessed on 25th November 2021)

Merlo, M. and Briales, R. E, 2000. “Public goods and externalities linked to Mediterranean forests: economic nature and policy”, Land Use Policy 17, 197-208 (2000). ISSN 0264-8377, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00017-X. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483770000017X (accessed on 6th July 2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00017-X

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, GoI, Consultation Paper on Forest Conservation Act, 1980, October 2, 2021. http://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/OMs-2004 2021/263_OM_02_10_2021.pdf

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, GoI, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 with Amendments made in 1988

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, GoI, Forest Conservation Act, 1980

Ministry of Tribal Affairs, GoI, Forest Rights Act, 2006 (Act, Rules and Guidelines)

Ministry of Tribal Affairs, GoI, The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996.

Moudgi Manu, 2019. “The Story of India’s Private Forest”, The WIRE, July 21. https://thewire.in/environment/the-story-of-indias-private-forests (accessed on 26th November 2021)

Pukkala, T, 2021. “Measuring the social performance of forest management”, Journal of Forestry Research, 32, 1803–1818 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01321-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01321-z

Oakland, W.H. (1987). Theory of public goods. In Handbook of public economics (Vol. 2, pp. 485-535). Elsevier DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(87)80004-6

The Constitution of India, Part III, Fundamental Rights. https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/iles/COI_English.pdf

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India and Ors, Supreme Court of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202/1995. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/187366700/#:~:text=It%20was%20held%20that%20the,the% 20State%20Government%20was%20rejected.