Analyzing India’s Science and Technology Policy – A Comparative Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v6iII.168

Keywords:

Science, Technology, Comparative, Policy, Analysis, Innovation

Abstract

The Government of India has been formulating science policies since the 1950s, with the latest version of the policy formulated in 2020. The paper aims to understand the extent to which the 2020 Science Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP) addresses the critiques and limitations of its predecessor policy launched in 2013.Therefore, this paper compares the 2020 STIP document to the 2013 version across essential parameters such as the role of innovation and inclusivity, focus on informality, support for research and others. The paper also brings in global comparison by elaborating on science policies of Brazil and South Africa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Tenzin Ngawang, Jindal School of Government and Public Policy

Tenzin Ngawang is an Assistant Manager at Jindal Global University. He has worked as Teaching Research Fellow at JGU. As a research fellow his area of research included refugee studies, education, and policy analysis.

Naresh Singh, Jindal School of Government and Public Policy

Naresh Singh is Professor and Vice Dean, Jindal School of Government and Public Policy, and Director of the Centre for Complexity Economics, Applied Spirituality and Public Policy (CEASP). He has more than three decades of public policy experience in senior positions in the United Nations, the Federal Government of Canada and as an advisor to governments across the global south.

Namesh Killemsetty, Jindal School of Government and Public Policy

Namesh Killemsetty is an Assistant Professor in the Jindal School of Government and Public Policy. As a transdisciplinary researcher working in urban governance and poverty, Namesh’s work particularly focuses on integrating theories and methods from Urban Studies, Policy Analysis, Operations Research, and Decision Sciences. His research is supported by his previous training in Infrastructure Management and Civil Engineering

Downloads

Published

2022-10-01

How to Cite

Ngawang, T., Singh, N., & Killemsetty, N. (2022). Analyzing India’s Science and Technology Policy – A Comparative Perspective. Jindal Journal of Public Policy, 6(II), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v6iII.168

Issue

Vol. 6 No. II (2022)

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Ahmad, A. (1980).Science and technology in India. Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists, 36(9), 38-41.doi: 10.1080/00963402.1980.11458782

Davar, P. (2021). Nehru's contribution to India's scientiic growth - The Statesman. Retrieved 9 December 2021, from https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/nehrus contribution-indias-scientiic-growth-1502821953.html

Dias, R., and Seraim, M. (2011). Science and Technology Policy in Brazil: an Analysis of the Recent Period. Research Gate 1-9,doi: 10.1109/ACSIP.2011.6064468

Desai, M., Fukuda-Parr, S., Johansson, C., and Sagasti, F. (2002). Measuring the Technology Achievement of Nations and the Capacity to Participate in the Network Age. Journal Of Human Development, 3(1), 95-122.doi: 10.1080/14649880120105399

AO (2002). Retrieved 17 January 2022, from https://www.fao.org/3/ac483e/ac483e09.htm

Global Hunger Index Scores by 2021 GHI Rank.(2021).Retrieved 23 December 2021, from https://www.globalhungerindex.org/ranking.html

India, Technology, S., and Infographic, G. (2021).Growth of Science & Technology Industry Infographic. Retrieved 10 December 2021, from https://www.ibef.org/industry/science and-technology/infographic

Innovation, O. (2022).Global Innovation Index, Brazilian Unicorns and National Innovation Ranking | Ofices of Science and Innovation. Retrieved 16 January 2022, from https://sweden-science-innovation.blog/brasilia/global-innovation-index-brazilian unicorns-and-national-innovation-ranking/

Innovation index by country, around the world | TheGlobalEconomy.com. (2022).Retrieved 17 January 2022, from https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/GII_Index/

Incekara, A., Guz, T., and Sengun, G. (2017). Measuring the technology achievement index: comparison and ranking of countries. Pressacademia, 4(2), 164-174.doi: 10.17261/pressacademia.2017.446

Joseph, K. (2013). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: whither innovation and inclusion?. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2. DOI: 10.20529/ijme.2013.031

Kaushik, A., Basha, B., and Ganesan, L. (2021). Science Technology and Innovation (STI) Policies in India: a Flashback. Retrieved 10 December 2021, from https://indiabioscience.org/columns/indian-scenario/science-technology-and-innovation sti-policies-in-india-a-lashback

Krishna, V. (2013). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: High on Goals, Low on Commitment. Economic and Political Weekly, 48/16: 15-19. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Kumar, V., and Battacharya, S. (2021).Science Technology and Innovation Policy Draft: Where do we stand?. Science Diplomacy, October-December

Lehmann, E., and Schenkenhofer, J. (2020). National Systems of Innovation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia Of Business And Management.doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.31

Mani, S.(2013).The Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: An Evaluation. Economic And Political Weekly, 48(10), 16-19.Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23391341

Ministry of Labour and Employment. (2014). Employment in informal sector and condition of informal environment Vol 4. Chandigarh: Labour Bureau, Government of India. From https://labour.gov.in/sites/default/iles/Report%20vol%204%20inal.pdf

Ministry of Science and technology, Department of Science and Technology,. (2020). Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. Delhi.

Mukhopadhyay, D. (2015).Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013: outline of a coherent strategy for translating it into action. Current Science, 109(5), 863.doi: 10.18520/cs/v109/i5/863-868

Ozkaya, G., Timor, M., &Erdin, C. (2021). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Indicators and Comparisons of Countries through a Hybrid Model of Data Mining and MCDM Methods. Sustainability, 13(2), 694.doi: 10.3390/su13020694

OECD (n.d).Retrieved 16 January 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2112129.pdf

Pinheiro, A. (2015). Apresentação: Stephen J. Kline, Nathan Rosenberg - An overview of innovation. RevistaBrasileira de Inovação, 14/1: 9. DOI: 10.20396/rbi.v14i1.8649088

Reyes-Galindo, L., Monteiro, M., and Macnaghten, P. (2019). 'Opening up' science policy: engaging with RRI in Brazil. Journal Of Responsible Innovation, 6(3), 353-360.doi: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1603568

Swilling, M. (2014).Rethinking the science–policy interface in South Africa: Experiments in knowledge co-production. South African Journal Of Science, 110(5/6), 1-7.doi: 10.1590/sajs.2014/20130265

Salami, R., and Soltanzadeh, J. (2012). Comparative Analysis for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy; Lessons Learned from Some Selected Countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for Other LdCs Like Iran. Journal Of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 211-227.doi: 10.4067/s0718-27242012000100014

Scarano, F., Padgurschi, M., Pires, A., Castro, P., Farinaci, J., and Bustamante, M. et al. (2019). Increasing effectiveness of the science-policy interface in the socioecological arena in Brazil. Biological Conservation, 240, 108227.doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108227

S&E Indicators 2018 | NSF - National Science Foundation. (2022). Retrieved 24 August 2022, from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/

Sheikh, F. (2014).Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2013 of India and informal sector innovations. Current Science, 106(1).

Salami, R., andSoltanzadeh, J. (2012). Comparative Analysis for Science,Technology and Innovation Policy; Lessons Learned from Some Selected Countries (Brazil, India, China, South Korea and South Africa) for Other LdCs Like Iran. Journal Of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 211-227.doi: 10.4067/s0718-27242012000100014

Sharma, D. (1976).Growth and Failures of India's Science Policy. Economic And Political Weekly, 11(57).

Thomas, H., Fressoli, M., and Becerra, L. (2012).Science and technology policy and social ex/inclusion: Analyzing opportunities and constraints in Brazil and Argentina. Science And Public Policy, 39(5), 579-591.doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs065

White, K. (2021).Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons | NSF National Science Foundation.Retrieved 10 December 2021, from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20206/publication-output-by-region-country-or-economy