Foundational Principles for a Robust Law on Public Service Delivery in India: Drawing Inspiration from International Instances and Practices

Authors

  • Sharan Bhavnani
  • Prashant Narang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v7i2.225

Abstract

Public service delivery and guarantee laws are instrumental in fostering good governance and economic growth, yet the legal framework in India remains fragmented across independent state legislations. This research paper aims to elaborate on the principles that should guide a model law, drawn from global best practices, and explores the influence of contemporary public management values on the evolution of the Indian legal landscape. The recent introduction of a national public service guarantee law has rekindled the debate on the need for a coherent framework. The paper compiles a list of global best practices for modernizing India's public service delivery laws. The research contributes to the ongoing discourse and emphasizes the significance of public service delivery in promoting inclusive and sustainable growth and development in India. It may prove to be a ready resource for creating a unified and effective legal structure that aligns with the needs of society and businesses. By synthesizing historical perspectives, current challenges, and future prospects, this paper serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, legal scholars, and practitioners seeking to understand and shape the future of public service delivery laws in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sharan Bhavnani

Sharan Bhavnani is a practicing Advocate and a public policy analyst. He completed his B.A.LL.B (Hons.) from the National Law School of India University, Bangalore in 2019. He was associated with Centre for Civil Society from 2021 to 2023.

Prashant Narang

Dr. Prashant Narang is a Senior Fellow, Research at Centre for Civil Society, Delhi.
(He is the corresponding author.)

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Bhavnani, S., & Narang, P. (2023). Foundational Principles for a Robust Law on Public Service Delivery in India: Drawing Inspiration from International Instances and Practices. Jindal Journal of Public Policy, 7(2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v7i2.225

Issue

Section

Articles

References

I. Legislations

Anti-Corruption Act, Law No. 85, 2017 (Suriname).

An Act Promoting Ease of Doing Business And Efficient Delivery of Government Services, Amending for the Purpose Republic Act No. 9485, Otherwise Known As The Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007, And for Other Purposes, Rep. Act No. 11032 (May 28, 2018) (Philippines).

Client Charter, 1993, Administrative Development Circular No. 3, 1993 (Malaysia).

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

Digitalization of Public Administration and Services Delivery Act, 2019, B.E. 2562, 2019 (Thailand).

E-Government Strategy, § 5.3.6 (Gambia).

Ease of Doing Business Bill, 2021, Bill No. B6, 2021 (South Africa).

Executive Order for the establishment of One Stop-Shops, 2017, No. 396, 2017 (Palau).

Guichet Unique, March 4, 2013, Order No. 035/CAB/MIN/J&DH/2013, 2013 (DR Congo).

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Public Services Act, 2014, Act No. IV of 2014, (Pakistan).

Law for the Simplification of Administrative Requirements and Procedures - Decreto No. 5-2021 del Congreso de la República de Guatemala, 2021, Law No. 5, 2021 (Guatemala).

Law No. 13/2016 (On the way of delivering public service at the front office level in the republic of Albania), 2016, Law No. 13, 2016 (Albania).

Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, Law No. 30, 2014 (Indonesia).

Law on electronic identification and electronic signature, 2017 (Montenegro).

Lithuania - Law on Public Administration 17 June 1999 No VIII-1234, 1999, Law No. VIII-1234, 1999 (Lithuania). [hereinafter Lithuania Law on Public Administration, 1999]

Malawi Public Service Charter, Act No. 19, 1994 (Malawi). I. Legislations

Malta Small Businesses Act, 2008 (Malta).

OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation, OECD/LEGAL/0278.

OECD, Regulatory Impact Assessment. (last visited Jan 18, 2023).

Parlametul Lege Nr. 179 din 21-07-2016 cu privire la întreprinderile mici şi mijlocii. Law No. 179/2016 of 21 July 2016 on small and medium-sized enterprises (Moldova).

Planalto (2018a), “Lei No. 13.726, de 8 de Outubro de 2018” [Law No. 13726, 8 October 2018], Presidency of the Republic, Brasilia, hƩp://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/Lei/L13726.html (Brazil).

Protección al ciudadano del exceso de requisitos y trámites administrativos (Act for Protection of the citizen from excess requirements and administrative procedures), 2002, Ley 8220, 2002 (Costa Rica).

Red Tape Reduction Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 26 - Bill 119, 2000 (Canada). 20. Parlametul Lege Nr. 179 din 21-07-2016 cu privire la întreprinderile mici şi mijlocii. Law No. 179/2016 of 21 July 2016 on small and medium-sized enterprises (Moldova).

Red Tape Reduction Act, 2019 (Idaho).

Sub-Decree On Functions And Structure Of Municipal Administrations, 2019, Sub-decree No. 182, 2019 (Cambodia).

The Odisha Right to Public Service Rules, 2012, The Odisha Gazette (Odisha Act 8 of 2012).

The Reducing Red Tape and Improving Services Act, 2021 (Manitoba).

The Electronic Delivery of Services Bill, 2011, Bill No. 137 of 2011 (December 21, 2011) (India).

The Quality Observatory, 1992 (Spain). [hereinafter Spain Quality Observatory]

Undang-Undang Tentang Pelayanan Publik, Public Service Law (Law No. 25/2009),(Indonesia).

Zambia Business Regulatory Act, 2014, Law No. 3, 2014 (Zambia).

II. Journal Articles, Books and Internet Sources

Ahmad Sarji, A.H. (1996). The civil service of Malaysia : towards efficiency and effectiveness : improvements and developments in the civil service of Malaysia 1995 : report. [Kuala Lumpur]: Govt. of Malaysia.

Basdevant, J. (1960). Dictionnaire de la Terminologie du Droit International, 91-92.

Bergh, S., Pellissery, S., & Sathyamala, C. (2022). The State of Accountability in the Global South: Challenges and ResponsesOpens external - doi: 10.4337/9781789907513.

Bouckaert, G. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60, 91-115.

Canuto, Otaviano & Giugale, Marcelo. (2010). The Day After Tomorrow: A Handbook on the Future of Economic Policy in the Developing World. World Bank, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/428571468151490454/pdf/567990PUB0The010Box353739B01PUBLIC1.pdf

Citizen's Charter in Government of India, https://goicharters.nic.in/public/website/home (last visited Jan 18, 2023).

DVARA Research. (April 2021). Delivery of Social Protection Entitlements in India: Unpacking Exclusion, Grievance Redress, and the Relevance of Citizen-Assistance Mechanisms 1, 6. https://www.dvara.com/research/wpcontent/uploads/2021/04/Delivery-of-Social-Protection-Entitlements-in-India-Unpacking-Exclusion-Grievance-Redress-and-the-Relevance-of-Citizen-Assistance-Mechanisms.pdf

Job Mokgoro Consulting cc. (2003). Batho Pele Policy Review – Final Report and Recommendations; Department of Public Service and Administration. (1997). White Paper on Transforming Public Service Delivery.

Klein, D. (2011). Government Windows Desk Officer, Administrative Reform in Hungary: One-Stop Shop Government Windows as the Initiation of Equal Access to Public Services.

Kovács, É., and Hajnal, G. (2014). 'Government Windows': One-Stop Shops for Administrative Services in Hungary. In: Lægreid, P., Sarapuu, K., Rykkja, L.H., Randma-Liiv, T. (eds) Organizing for Coordination in the Public Sector. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359636_20.

MacLachlan, P., & Trentmann, F. (2004). Civilizing markets: Traditions of consumer politics in twentieth-century Britain, Japan and the United States. In M. Bevir & F. Trentmann (Eds.), Markets in Historical Contexts: Ideas and Politics in the Modern World (pp. 170-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi:10.1017/CBO9780511496677.009

Major, J. (2000). John Major: The Autobiography. HarperCollins Publications.

Mr Major's Speech to the Economist Conference on the Citizen's Charter, 27 January 1992. hƩps://johnmajorarchive.org.uk/1992/01/27/mr-majors-speech-to-the-economist-conference-on-the-ciƟzens-charter-27-january-1992/ (last visited Jan 18, 2023).

Needham, C. (2023) Citizen-consumers – New Labour's marketplace democracy. https://www.catalystforum.org.uk/pdf/needham.pdf;

OECD (1997), Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practices in OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris, . https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264162150-en.

OECD (2013), "Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda", in Government at a Glance 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2013-6-en.

OECD/ADB (2020), “Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Philippines”, OECD, Paris.

P, S., Sinha, N., Varghese, A., Durani, A., & Patel, A. (2021). 'Bureaucratic Indecision and Risk Aversion'. IDFC Institute Working Papers.

Panagriya, A. (March 2004). India in the 1980s and 1990s: A Triumph of Reforms. IMF Working Paper. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/wp0443.pdf.

Pareek, U., & Sole, N. A. (2020). Delivery of Time-Bound Public Services to Citizens: Indian Experience. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 343–355.

Pre-Concept Note – Business Enabling Environment. (February 4, 2022). https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/pdf/BEE-Pre-Concept-Note---Feb-8-2022.pdf

Paul, S. (2008). India's Citizen's Charters: In Search of a Champion. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(7), 67–73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40277614

Root, H. (1998). A Liberal India: The Triumph of Hope over Experience. Asian Survey, 38. 510-534. 10.1525/as.1998.38.5.01p03596.

The Economic Times. ( December 27, 2011). Electronic Delivery of Services Bill introduced in Parliament. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/ampnbspelectronic-delivery-of-services-bill-introduced-in-parliamentampnbsp/articleshow/11267287.cms (last visited January 18, 2023).

United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business (UN/CEFACT). Case Studies on Implementing a Single Window to enhance the efficient exchange of information between trade and government, 1-88, 5. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/cefact/single_window/draft_160905.pdf.