Rethinking International Political Economy: Cementing Resilient Governance in a Fragmented World Order

Authors

  • Ojus Sharma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v7i2.231

Keywords:

No Keywords.

Abstract

This research paper examines the International Political Economy (IPE) to explore how the adoption of systems thinking can foster resilient governance in an increasingly fragmented global landscape. It juxtaposes the linear philosophy predominant in Western thought with the nonlinear essence ingrained in Eastern philosophy, linking these paradigms to the qualitative and quantitative approaches that shape IPE. Through a comparative analysis of instruments for growth, linear-nonlinear feedback loops, and the interplay between trade policy and international relations dynamics, the paper argues for the convergence of top-down and bottom-up strategies in policymaking. By integrating these diverse perspectives, the argument endeavours to highlight the importance of reconciling disparate approaches to enhance the adaptability and efcacy of governance systems in a complex world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Sharma, O. (2023). Rethinking International Political Economy: Cementing Resilient Governance in a Fragmented World Order. Jindal Journal of Public Policy, 7(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.54945/jjpp.v7i2.231

Issue

Volume 7, Issue 2, November 2023

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Au, W. (2013). Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in US education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2).

De Landa, M. (2021). A thousand years of nonlinear history. Princeton University Press.

Edquist, C. (2016). The Swedish National Innovation Council: Innovation policy governance to replace linearity with holism. Papers in Innovation Studies 24: 1-52.

Homsy, G. C., Liu, Z. & Warner, M.E. (2019). Multilevel governance: Framing the integration of top-down and bottom-up policymaking. International Journal of Public Administration 42(7): 572-582.

Jenkins, T. N. (2002). Chinese traditional thought and practice: lessons for an ecological economics worldview. Ecological Economics, 40(1), 39-52.

Kelleghan, T., Madaus, G. F., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). The effects of standardised testing (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.

Knyazeva, H. (1999). The synergetic principles of nonlinear thinking. World Futures 54(2): 163-181.

Ling, L. (2018). China's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological forecasting and social change 135: 66-74.

Ling, L. H. (2013). The Dao of world politics: towards a post-Westphalian, worldist international relations. Routledge.

Molderez, I. & Ceulemans, K. (2018). The power of art to foster systems thinking, one of the key competencies of education for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production 186: 758-770.

Patrick, L., & Julia, S. O. (Eds.). (2017). OECD insights debate the issues: Complexity and policy making. OECD Publishing.

Reus–Smit, C. (2002). Imagining society: constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 4(3), 487-509.

Ruigrok, W. and Van Tulder, R. (2013). The logic of international restructuring: The management of dependencies in rival industrial complexes. Routledge.

Wendt, A. (2003). Why a world state is inevitable. European journal of international relations 9(4): 491-542.